Ship the issue without restarting the search.
The topic and everything you have read on it stays put between issues. The next piece starts from accumulated reading rather than an empty search box.
Titrate is pre-launch. What is described here is what it is being built to do, with Jeff Casebolt, PhD.
The central question
Does the barbell hip thrust produce superior gluteus maximus development — measured either as acute EMG activation or as chronic hypertrophy — compared to the back squat?
- Contreras et al.2015n=13supports
- Delgado et al.2019n=8mixed
- Plotkin et al.2023n=34contradicts
- Krause Neto et al.2025n=12mixed
- Vigotsky et al.2017n=—contradicts
- Kassiano et al.2024n=33supports
A workbench, not a chatbot.
Nothing here writes a confident paragraph for you to trust. There is no chat window. You keep the judgment; the tool keeps the trail back to the papers. It cannot hallucinate a citation because it does not generate citations at all — a claim points at a paper already sitting in your own library, or it points at nothing.
How it comes together
01
Keep the papers you already read — or start from the topic and keep only what you judge worth keeping. Either way they land as PDFs or citation-only records in a library that is yours.
02
Group them into the topic this piece of work belongs to.
03
Write the position, with each claim carrying its citation.
04
Ship it — a piece you can publish under your own name, where every claim points at the paper it came from.
Why this matters here
You restart the literature search for each piece, and when an editor or a reader asks for the citation you rebuild the trail from memory. Summarizing tools help you read faster; none of them produce anything you can publish.
Titrate is pre-launch.
Join the practitioner waitlistOne email when the first practitioner cohort opens. Nothing else.
