Opening application…
Coaches, clinicians and dietitians answer to a person, in the room, today. Titrate keeps the research you rely on organized as positions you can hand over — with the sources attached.
Titrate is pre-launch. What is described here is what it is being built to do, with Jeff Casebolt, PhD (ABD).
The central question
Does passing objective return-to-sport (RTS) criteria/test batteries (strength symmetry limb-symmetry indices, hop tests, time-based thresholds, etc.) before returning to sport reduce an athlete's risk of a second ACL injury (graft rupture or contralateral tear)?
When you are accountable to a client, a patient or an athlete, being right is not enough — you have to be able to show your work, at the moment they ask. That is a different problem from searching the literature, and it is the one this category is built around.
A workbench, not a chatbot.
Nothing here writes a confident paragraph for you to trust. There is no chat window. You keep the judgment; the tool keeps the trail back to the papers. It cannot hallucinate a citation because it does not generate citations at all — a claim points at a paper already sitting in your own library, or it points at nothing.
Bring the papers, or start from the topic. Group them into the questions you actually get asked. Write positions with the citations attached. Publish under your own name — a workspace holds eight surfaces, from the library to the answer you send a client.
The whole mechanism, and what a workspace holdsOne email when the first practitioner cohort opens. Nothing else.